2008 Election ProCon.org
Home About Us Methodology Glossary Terms of Use Contact Us ProCon Homepage & More Topics

Should the federal government fund school voucher programs?

Candidates' positions are categorized as Pro (Yes), Con (No), Not Clearly Pro or Con, or None Found.
Candidates who have changed their positions are listed as Now their most recent position.
(Candidates are listed in alphabetical order by party; black & white photos indicate candidates who have withdrawn or who no longer meet our criteria.)

Democratic Party (D)
Candidate
Position
  Clinton, Hillary
Con
  Obama, Barack
Now Not Clearly Pro or Con
  Biden, Joe
(Withdrew on
Jan. 3, 2008)
None Found
  Dodd, Chris
(Withdrew on
Jan. 3, 2008)
None Found
  Edwards, John
(Withdrew on
Jan. 30, 2008)
None Found
  Kucinich, Dennis
(Withdrew on
Jan. 25, 2008)
None Found
  Richardson, Bill
(Withdrew on
Jan. 10, 2008)
None Found
  Vilsack, Tom
(Withdrew on
Feb. 23, 2007)
None Found
Republican Party (R)
Candidate
Position
  McCain, John
Pro
  Paul, Ron Con
  Brownback, Sam
(Withdrew on
Oct. 19, 2007)
None Found
  Gilmore, Jim
(Withdrew on
July 14, 2007)
None Found
  Giuliani, Rudy
(Withdrew on
Jan. 30, 2008)
None Found
  Huckabee, Mike
(Withdrew on
Mar. 4, 2008)
Con
  Hunter, Duncan
(Withdrew on
Jan. 19, 2008)
None Found
  Romney, Mitt
(Withdrew on
Feb. 7, 2008)
None Found
  Tancredo, Tom
(Withdrew on
Dec. 20, 2007)
None Found
  Thompson, Fred
(Withdrew on
Jan. 22, 2008)
None Found
  Thompson, Tommy
(Withdrew on
Aug. 12, 2007)
None Found
3rd Parties / Independents (3rd/I)
Candidate
Position
 Gravel, Mike
 (Lib)
Pro
 Keyes, Alan
 (Ind)
Pro
 McKinney, Cynthia
 (Grn)
None Found
 Nader, Ralph
 (Ind)
Con
 Imperato, Daniel
 (Ind)
None Found
 Kubby, Steve
 (Lib)
Con
 McEnulty, Frank
 (Ind)
Not Clearly Pro or Con
 Smith, Christine
 (Lib)
Con
Additional Resources:

  1. Has the No Child Left Behind Act been effective at improving public education? - We asked the 2008 presidential candidates this question. Read their pro and con responses.
  2. Read the definition of school vouchers in our Glossary.


ISSUES
Abortion
1. Legal option
2. Parental consent
Character
3. Honesty vs. competence
China
4. Threat to U.S.?
5. Human rights

Criminal Justice
6. Felon voting
7. Rehab vs. incarceration
Cuba
8. Embargo
Darfur
9. Genocide

Death Penalty
10. Legal option

Defense
11. Missile defense shield

District of Columbia
12. Statehood

Economy
13. Outsourcing jobs
14. Free trade regulations
15. NAFTA

Education
16. No Child Left Behind
17. Increasing costs
18. School vouchers
19. Abstinence only

Election Reform
20. Paper trails
21. Campaign contributions
22. Public financing

Eminent Domain
23. Non-government use

Energy
24. ANWR drilling
25. Price of U.S. gasoline

Environment
26. International agreements
27. Fuel efficiency
28. Global climate change

Gun Control
29. Federal regulations

Health Care
30. Subsidized care
31. Prescription options
32. Fast food and obesity

Immigration
33. Net impact on economy
34. Rights and benefits
35. U.S.-Mexico fence

Iran
36. U.S. military force
Iraq War
37. Was the attack a mistake?
38. Is America safer?
39. Withdrawal timetable

Israel
40. Military and economic aid

Israeli-Palestinian conflict
41. Hamas
42. Palestine

Kosovo
43. Independence

Marriage
44. Constitutional amendment
45. Infidelity

Media
46. Protecting sources

Medical Marijuana
47. Legalization
48. Raids

National I.D.
49. National I.D. card

National Service
50. Draft
51. Gays in the military
52. Mandatory service

Presidential Power
53. Line item veto
54. Unitary executive theory

Religion
55. Faith-based funding
56. Importance to voters

Social Security
57. Privatizing

Stem Cells
58. Federal funding

Taxes
59. Bush tax cuts

Turkey
60. Entering Iraq

U.S. Constitution
61. Alteration

War on Terror
62. Waterboarding
63. Guantanamo Bay
64. PATRIOT Act
65. Warrantless wiretapping



Should the federal government fund school voucher programs?

Candidates are listed in alphabetical order. Positions are categorized as Pro (Yes), Con (No), Not Clearly Pro or Con, or None Found.
Candidates who have withdrawn or who no longer meet our
criteria are listed last.

   Pro (Yes)    Con (No)

   Clinton, Hillary (D) - Con

Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator (D-NY), stated in a July 6, 1999 article titled "NEA Representative Assembly Closes with Infusion of Energy and Resolve" on the National Education Association website:

"What they (vouchers) have done is to divert public funds for a few and weaken an entire system."
July 6, 1999 Hillary Clinton


Top
   Gravel, Mike (Lib) - Pro

Mike Gravel, former U.S. Senator (D-AK), in a July 11, 2007 radio interview with Mike Malloy on Nova-M Radio Network, stated:

"...I have no problem with vouchers in education. I think we need competition in education."
July 11, 2007 Mike Gravel


Top
   Keyes, Alan (Ind) - Pro

Alan Keyes, former Assistant U.S. Secretary of State, stated in an Oct. 26, 2004 debate sponsored by WTTW and the City Club of Chicago:

"We have the wherewithal and, in addition to everything else, if we adopted a proper voucher program, we would equalize the scandalous inequities in education that occur in Illinois because of the funding mechanism that leaves some kids stuck in poor districts. Give every parent the same amount that they'll be able to spend on their child, and you can bet, in faith schools and parochial schools and other, non-government schools, they'll be able to get better results for less money than we're getting right now."
Oct. 26, 2004 Alan Keyes


Top
McCain, John (R) - Pro

John McCain, U.S. Senator (R-AZ), stated at the Dec. 9, 2007 Republican Presidential Debate in Coral Gables, FL:

"Choice and competition is the key to success in education in America. That means charter schools, that means home schooling, it means vouchers, it means rewarding good teachers and finding bad teachers another line of work...It means rewarding good performing schools, and it really means in some cases putting bad performing schools out of business."
Dec. 9, 2007 John McCain


Top
 
   McKinney, Cynthia (Grn) - None Found
 
 
ProCon.org emailed the McKinney campaign on Mar. 26, 2008 with this question. We had not received a reply or found a position as of Apr. 11, 2008.
 


Top
   Nader, Ralph (Ind) - Con

Ralph Nader, attorney, author, and political activist, was quoted in an article titled "Major Players: The 2000 Presidential Candidates," posted on the Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy at Duke University website (accessed Apr. 9, 2008)

"Vouchers unacceptably erode the democratic foundation of public education and the role of public education in establishing our democratic foundations."
Apr. 9, 2008 Ralph Nader


Top
          Obama, Barack (D) - Now Not Clearly Pro or Con

Barack Obama, U.S. Senator (D-IL), in a Feb. 13, 2008 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article titled "Obama Addresses State, U.S. Topics," stated:

"If there was any argument for vouchers, it was 'Let's see if the experiment works'...And if it does, whatever my preconception, you do what's best for kids."
Feb. 13, 2008 Barack Obama

    Obama, Barack (D) - Con

[Editor's Note: Prior to Barack Obama's Feb. 13, 2008 Not Clearly Pro or Con position, his position was Con as indicated in his July 10, 2007 statement in the American Federation of Teachers' "2008 U.S. Presidential Candidate Questionnaire" below.]

"We need to invest in our public schools and strengthen them, not drain their fiscal support. And for this reason I do not support vouchers. In the end, vouchers would reduce the options available to children in need. I fear these children would truly be left behind in a private market system."
July 10, 2007 Barack Obama


Top

   Paul, Ron (R) - Con

Ron Paul, U.S. Representative (R-TX), stated in a Sep. 30, 2003 "Speech of Hon. Ron Paul of Texas in the House of Representatives" in the Congressional Record on the Library of Congress, THOMAS website:

"Mr. Speaker, many of those who share my belief that the most effective education reform is to put parents back in charge of the education system have embraced government-funded voucher programs as a means to that end. I certainly sympathize with the goals of voucher proponents and I believe that States and local governments have the right, protected by the Tenth Amendment, to adopt any sort of voucher program they believe meets the needs of their communities. However, I have a number of concerns regarding proposals to implement a voucher plan on the Federal level.

The basic reason supporters of parental control of education should view Federal voucher programs with a high degree of skepticism is that vouchers are a creation of the government, not the market. Vouchers are a taxpayer-funded program benefiting a particular group of children selected by politicians and bureaucrats. Therefore, the Federal voucher program supported by many conservatives is little more than another tax-funded welfare program establishing an entitlement to a private school education. Vouchers thus raise the same constitutional and moral questions as other transfer programs."
Sep. 30, 2003 Ron Paul

CANDIDATES WHO HAVE WITHDRAWN OR WHO NO LONGER MEET OUR CRITERIA
     Biden, Joe (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 3, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Brownback, Sam (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Oct. 19, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Dodd, Chris (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 3, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Edwards, John (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 30, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Gilmore, Jim (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Aug. 14, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Giuliani, Rudy (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 30, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top

   Huckabee, Mike (R) - Con

Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas, stated in a Dec. 28, 2007 article titled "Exclusive Interview: Huckabee on Education and School Choice" on CNSNews.com:

"I don't support federally mandating vouchers. If a state wishes to implement a voucher program, they have to decide how it works, and how well it works, and what the criteria would be.

What I don't want to do is to have the federal government coming down and telling all 50 states here is how you are going to fund education, here is what vouchers are going to look like. Because in some states, for example mine, it would be very problematic to create a statewide voucher system when most of our schools are rural, they're small, they are miles from another school, the economies of scale simply wouldn't necessarily make it that easy to implement a widespread voucher system. But if local districts wished to do it, if states wish to do it, I think that's fine. It goes back to the basic concept that this is a state's decision."
Dec. 28, 2007 Mike Huckabee


Top
     Hunter, Duncan (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 19, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Imperato, Daniel (3rd/I) - None Found

ProCon.org emailed the Imperato campaign on Jan. 21, 2008 with this question. Mr. Imperato provided a response to this question and 26 others during a recorded 45-minute telephone interview with ProCon.org on Mar. 11, 2008. On Mar. 21, 2008 Mr. Imperato no longer met our eligibility criteria for inclusion on this site, and we stopped transcribing his verbal responses as of that date.

 

Top

   Kubby, Steve (3rd/I) - Con

Steve Kubby, a Libertarian candidate and founder of the American Medical Marijuana Association, stated in a Feb. 22, 2008 email to ProCon.org:

"No. The Constitution doesn't delegate any role in education to the federal government at all."
Feb. 22, 2008 Steve Kubby


Top
     Kucinich, Dennis (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 25, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     McEnulty, Frank (3rd/I) - Not Clearly Pro or Con

Frank McEnulty, an Independent candidate and President of Our Castle Homes, in a Feb. 28, 2008 email to ProCon.org, stated:

"Yes and no. The federal government should fund educational monies to the states and the states should determine how those monies should be spent without federal government interference. That being said, I believe that school voucher programs are an excellent way to give lower income students a chance at a better education and give some competition to the entrenched public school systems."
Feb. 28, 2008 Frank McEnulty


Top
     Richardson, Bill (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 10, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Romney, Mitt (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Feb. 7, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
   Smith, Christine (3rd/I) - Con

Christine Smith, a Libertarian candidate and a social and political activist, stated in a Feb. 27, 2008 email to ProCon.org:

"No."
Feb. 27, 2008 Christine Smith

Top
     Tancredo, Tom (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Dec. 20, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Thompson, Fred (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 22, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Thompson, Tommy (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Sep. 12, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Vilsack, Tom (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Feb. 23, 2007; no position found as of that date

Home About Us Methodology Glossary Terms of Use Contact Us ProCon Homepage & More Topics