2008 Election ProCon.org
Home About Us Methodology Glossary Terms of Use Contact Us ProCon Homepage & More Topics

Has the No Child Left Behind Act been effective at improving public education?

Candidates' positions are categorized as Pro (Yes), Con (No), Not Clearly Pro or Con, or None Found.
Candidates who have changed their positions are listed as Now their most recent position.
(Candidates are listed in alphabetical order by party; black & white photos indicate candidates who have withdrawn or who no longer meet our criteria.)

Democratic Party (D)
Candidate
Position
  Clinton, Hillary
Con
  Obama, Barack
Con
  Biden, Joe
(Withdrew on
Jan. 3, 2008)
None Found
  Dodd, Chris
(Withdrew on
Jan. 3, 2008)
None Found
  Edwards, John
(Withdrew on
Jan. 30, 2008)
Con
  Kucinich, Dennis
(Withdrew on
Jan. 25, 2008)
None Found
  Richardson, Bill
(Withdrew on
Jan. 10, 2008)
None Found
  Vilsack, Tom
(Withdrew on
Feb. 23, 2007)
None Found
Republican Party (R)
Candidate
Position
  McCain, John
Pro
  Paul, Ron Con
  Brownback, Sam
(Withdrew on
Oct. 19, 2007)
None Found
  Gilmore, Jim
(Withdrew on
July 14, 2007)
None Found
  Giuliani, Rudy
(Withdrew on
Jan. 30, 2008)
Con
  Huckabee, Mike
(Withdrew on
Mar. 4, 2008)
Not Clearly Pro or Con
  Hunter, Duncan
(Withdrew on
Jan. 19, 2008)
None Found
  Romney, Mitt
(Withdrew on
Feb. 7, 2008)
Pro
  Tancredo, Tom
(Withdrew on
Dec. 20, 2007)
None Found
  Thompson, Fred
(Withdrew on
Jan. 22, 2008)
None Found
  Thompson, Tommy
(Withdrew on
Aug. 12, 2007)
None Found
3rd Parties / Independents (3rd/I)
Candidate
Position
 Gravel, Mike
 (Lib)
Con
 Keyes, Alan
 (Ind)
Not Clearly Pro or Con
 McKinney, Cynthia
 (Grn)
Not Clearly Pro or Con
 Nader, Ralph
 (Ind)
Con
 Imperato, Daniel
 (Ind)
None Found
 Kubby, Steve
 (Lib)
Con
 McEnulty, Frank
 (Ind)
Con
 Smith, Christine
 (Lib)
Con
Additional Resources:

  1. Read what the No Child Left Behind Act is in our Glossary.

  2. Should the federal government fund school voucher programs? - We asked the 2008 presidential candidates this question. Read their pro and con responses.


ISSUES
Abortion
1. Legal option
2. Parental consent
Character
3. Honesty vs. competence
China
4. Threat to U.S.?
5. Human rights

Criminal Justice
6. Felon voting
7. Rehab vs. incarceration
Cuba
8. Embargo
Darfur
9. Genocide

Death Penalty
10. Legal option

Defense
11. Missile defense shield

District of Columbia
12. Statehood

Economy
13. Outsourcing jobs
14. Free trade regulations
15. NAFTA

Education
16. No Child Left Behind
17. Increasing costs
18. School vouchers
19. Abstinence only

Election Reform
20. Paper trails
21. Campaign contributions
22. Public financing

Eminent Domain
23. Non-government use

Energy
24. ANWR drilling
25. Price of U.S. gasoline

Environment
26. International agreements
27. Fuel efficiency
28. Global climate change

Gun Control
29. Federal regulations

Health Care
30. Subsidized care
31. Prescription options
32. Fast food and obesity

Immigration
33. Net impact on economy
34. Rights and benefits
35. U.S.-Mexico fence

Iran
36. U.S. military force
Iraq War
37. Was the attack a mistake?
38. Is America safer?
39. Withdrawal timetable

Israel
40. Military and economic aid

Israeli-Palestinian conflict
41. Hamas
42. Palestine

Kosovo
43. Independence

Marriage
44. Constitutional amendment
45. Infidelity

Media
46. Protecting sources

Medical Marijuana
47. Legalization
48. Raids

National I.D.
49. National I.D. card

National Service
50. Draft
51. Gays in the military
52. Mandatory service

Presidential Power
53. Line item veto
54. Unitary executive theory

Religion
55. Faith-based funding
56. Importance to voters

Social Security
57. Privatizing

Stem Cells
58. Federal funding

Taxes
59. Bush tax cuts

Turkey
60. Entering Iraq

U.S. Constitution
61. Alteration

War on Terror
62. Waterboarding
63. Guantanamo Bay
64. PATRIOT Act
65. Warrantless wiretapping



Has the No Child Left Behind Act been effective at improving public education?

Candidates are listed in alphabetical order. Positions are categorized as Pro (Yes), Con (No), Not Clearly Pro or Con, or None Found.
Candidates who have withdrawn or who no longer meet our
criteria are listed last.

   Pro (Yes)    Con (No)

   Clinton, Hillary (D) - Con

Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator (D-NY), stated in a video titled "Clinton on No Child Left Behind" on the Glassbooth.org website (accessed Jan. 28, 2008):

"For those who are in education, you already know that the No Child Left Behind Act, which was intended to provide more resources for schools and create more support for the teaching and learning enterprise has unfortunately not been either funded or implemented, in my view, effectively or appropriately."
Jan. 28, 2008 Hillary Clinton


Top
   Gravel, Mike (Lib) - Con

Mike Gravel, former U.S. Senator (D-AK), stated in an Oct. 16, 2007 article titled "Election '08: Talk with the Candidates" on washingtonpost.com:

"No Child Left Behind is a failure. Our whole system of education is in trouble. All of the stakeholders are all at fault -- a third of our children don't graduate from high school. That is appalling."
Oct. 16, 2007 Mike Gravel


Top
     Keyes, Alan (Ind) - Not Clearly Pro or Con

Alan Keyes, former Assistant U.S. Secretary of State, stated during an Oct. 22, 2004 interview on the Mancow Show:

"I don't believe in federal control of education, and I believe that No Child Left Behind leads to a consolidation of control in the hands of the federal bureaucracy, which is something I've fought against in education. I think it's a parental, family, community, local responsibility, and we shouldn't be allowing federal bureaucracy to take it over."
Oct. 22, 2004 Alan Keyes

Top
   McCain, John (R) - Pro

John McCain, U.S. Senator (R-AZ), stated in a Washington Post online election resource guide titled "The Presidential Field: John McCain" (accessed Jan. 25, 2008):

"The principles underneath No Child Left Behind -- standards, accountability, transparency, and choice-- are a major step in the right direction; taking away power from education bureaucrats and returning it to those on the front lines of education -- the local schools, the local teachers and the local parents. It has provided support and guidance to our state and local communities to strengthen our schools, while also giving much needed flexibility for every state in the use of federal education dollars. It also contains many initiatives that have helped ensure that more federal education dollars reach our classrooms rather than being lost in bureaucratic black hole."
Jan. 25, 2008 John McCain


Top
     McKinney, Cynthia (Grn) - Not Clearly Pro or Con

Cynthia McKinney, former U.S. House Representative (D-GA), stated in an article titled "Cynthia McKinney on Education," posted on the Cynthia for Congress website (accessed Apr. 8, 2008):

"In the years since President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, none of his budgets has come close to meeting the level of funding authorized in the Act. The cumulative Administration budgets have fallen billions of dollars short of the amount authorized for funding...

The bipartisan National Governors Association even voted unanimously to label Bush's No Child Left Behind Act an unfunded mandate. States and localities struggle to keep up with the new requirements."
Apr. 8, 2008 Cynthia McKinney


Top
   Nader, Ralph (Ind) - Con

Ralph Nader, attorney, author, and political activist, stated in a July 16, 2004 speech at a Nader-Camejo 2004 campaign rally in San Francisco, CA:

"And they say we are going to leave no child behind and these corporate consulting firms in Washington, they want to sell more of these hyper-muliple-choice standardized tests in order to avoid a broader, more personal appraisal of the multiple intelligence of young children. And so they get [George W.] Bush to say 'leave no child behind.' And he doesn't fund it, number one, and he is forcing these tests on these children and forcing the teachers to teach to the test and envelope these schools in rigid, bureaucratic, unfunded anxiety on stupid tests that should be thrown into San Francisco Bay."
July 16, 2004 Ralph Nader


Top
   Obama, Barack (D) - Con

Barack Obama, U.S. Senator (D-IL), stated in an article titled "Issues: Education" on his official campaign website (accessed Jan. 28, 2008):

"No Child Left Behind Left the Money Behind: The goal of the law was the right one, but unfulfilled funding promises, inadequate implementation by the Education Department and shortcomings in the design of the law itself have limited its effectiveness and undercut its support. As a result, the law has failed to provide high-quality teachers in every classroom and failed to adequately support and pay those teachers."
Jan. 28, 2008 Barack Obama


Top

   Paul, Ron (R) - Con

Ron Paul, U.S. Representative (R-TX), stated in a May 23, 2001 article titled "Statement on No Child Left Behind" on his official campaign website:

"Congress is now considering whether to continue this cycle by passing the national five-year plan contained in H.R. 1, the so-called 'No Child Left Behind Act.' A better title for this bill is 'No Bureaucrat Left Behind' because, even though it's proponents claim H.R. 1 restores power over education to states and local communities, this bill represents a massive increase in federal control over education. H.R. 1 contains the word 'ensure' 150 times, 'require' 477 times, 'shall' 1,537 and 'shall not' 123 times. These words are usually used to signify federal orders to states and localities. Only in a town where a decrease in the rate of spending increases is considered a cut could a bill laden with federal mandates be considered an increase in local control!

If, after the experience of the past thirty years, you believe that federal bureaucrats are better able to meet children's unique educational needs than parents and communities then vote for H.R. 1. However, if you believe that the failures of the past shows expanding federal control over the classroom is a recipe for leaving every child behind then do not settle for some limited state flexibility in the context of a massive expansion of federal power: Reject H.R. 1 and instead help put education resources back into the hands of parents by supporting my Family Education Freedom Act and Education Improvement Tax Cut Act."
May 23, 2001 Ron Paul

CANDIDATES WHO HAVE WITHDRAWN OR WHO NO LONGER MEET OUR CRITERIA
     Biden, Joe (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 3, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Brownback, Sam (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Oct. 19, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Dodd, Chris (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 3, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
   Edwards, John (D) - Con

John Edwards, former U.S. Senator (D-NC), in an article titled "Restoring the Promise of America's Schools" on his official campaign website (accessed Jan. 29, 2008), stated:

"George Bush's No Child Left Behind law is not working for schools, teachers and – most importantly – our children, and it needs to be radically overhauled."
Jan. 29, 2008 John Edwards


Top
     Gilmore, Jim (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Aug. 14, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
   Giuliani, Rudy (R) - Con

Rudy Giuliani, former Mayor of New York City, stated at the Oct. 21, 2007 Republican Presidential Debate in Orlando, FL, hosted by FOX News:

"It seems to me the thing that's wrong right at the core of No Child Left Behind is the enforcer of standards should not be the bureaucrat in Washington or on the board of education. It should be the parent. We should have choice. We should empower parents. They should decide -- private school, parochial school, public school, charter school, home school.

That will give the parents the kind of control over their children's education. They understand their children better. Why should a government bureaucrat be sending 168,000 children to failing schools when parents think they can do better for their children? I think it's the single biggest civil rights issue that we face in the 21st century."
Oct. 21, 2007 Rudy Giuliani


Top
     Huckabee, Mike (R) - Not Clearly Pro or Con

Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas, in an article titled "Issues: Education and the Arts" on his official campaign website (accessed Jan. 24, 2008), stated:

"As President, my education agenda will include working towards a clear distinction between the federal role in assisting and empowering states and in usurping the right of states to carry out the education programs for their students. While there is value in the 'No Child Left Behind' law's effort to set high national standards, states must be allowed to develop their own benchmarks."
Jan. 24, 2008 Mike Huckabee

Top
     Hunter, Duncan (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 19, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Imperato, Daniel (3rd/I) - None Found

ProCon.org emailed the Imperato campaign on Jan. 21, 2008 with this question. Mr. Imperato provided a response to this question and 26 others during a recorded 45-minute telephone interview with ProCon.org on Mar. 11, 2008. On Mar. 21, 2008 Mr. Imperato no longer met our eligibility criteria for inclusion on this site, and we stopped transcribing his verbal responses as of that date.

 

Top
   Kubby, Steve (3rd/I) - Con

Steve Kubby, a Libertarian candidate and founder of the American Medical Marijuana Association, stated in a Jan. 31, 2008 email to ProCon.org:

"No. Government involvement in education -- and particularly federal government involvement in education -- doesn't work. The federal government provides a small percentage of overall education funding in America, but NCLB [No Child Left Behind] imposes uniform standards and central planning on thousands of schools and millions of students in very diverse places and situations. No two communities are the same. No two STUDENTS are the same. How can we expect a bureaucrat in Washington, DC to know what all those communities and all those students need from their schools?"
Jan. 31, 2008 Steve Kubby


Top
     Kucinich, Dennis (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 25, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
   McEnulty, Frank (3rd/I) - Con

Frank McEnulty, an Independent candidate and President of Our Castle Homes, in a Jan. 24, 2008 email to ProCon.org, stated:

"I don't believe so. A one size fits all approach to education will never work in a country as diverse as ours. All it has accomplished is the establishment of another bureaucracy and a system that now does its best to teach to the test so that they look good. Whether or not the children truly learn anything is irrelevant, as long as they do well on the 'test'."
Jan. 24, 2008 Frank McEnulty


Top
     Richardson, Bill (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 10, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
   Romney, Mitt (R) - Pro

Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts, issued the following statement in an article titled "Issues: Raising the Bar on Education" on his official campaign website (accessed Jan. 25, 2008):

"Governor Romney Will Improve Upon And Enhance No Child Left Behind (NCLB). He believes that No Child Left Behind has played an important role in stressing the role of accountability and high standards in improving our schools. Governor Romney will improve NCLB by giving states that meet or exceed testing requirements additional flexibility in measuring student performance. He will also improve the law by focusing more attention on individual student progress, rather than the overall progress of schools."
Jan. 25, 2008 Mitt Romney


Top
   Smith, Christine (3rd/I) - Con

Christine Smith, a Libertarian candidate and a social and political activist, stated in a Feb. 27, 2008 email to ProCon.org:

"No."
Feb. 27, 2008 Christine Smith


Top
     Tancredo, Tom (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Dec. 20, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Thompson, Fred (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Jan. 22, 2008; no position found as of that date


Top
     Thompson, Tommy (R) - None Found  
Withdrew on Sep. 12, 2007; no position found as of that date


Top
     Vilsack, Tom (D) - None Found  
Withdrew on Feb. 23, 2007; no position found as of that date

Home About Us Methodology Glossary Terms of Use Contact Us ProCon Homepage & More Topics